Nones v. Gelbaud
This text of 11 Serg. & Rawle 9 (Nones v. Gelbaud) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
If the plaintiff takes out a rule for arbitration before bail entered, he waives the bail:, But the defendant has no right to enter the rule until he has given hail, because if. he has, he may deprive the plaintiff of bail, and that was not the intention of th<j act of assembly. In this case the plaintiff did not consent to proceed before the arbitrators. Ifhehad, itwouldhave been a waiver of bail.. But he positively objected to their proceeding, notwith[10]*10standing which they did proceed, and made an award that there was no cause of action. Under the circumstances, it is the opinion of the court that the rule for arbitration was illegally entered and the award should be set aside.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Serg. & Rawle 9, 1824 Pa. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nones-v-gelbaud-pa-1824.