Non-Party Interested Persons v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Non-Party Interested Persons v. State

101 So. 3d 920, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20593, 2012 WL 5968777

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 30, 2012

DocketNo. 5D12-3235

StatusPublished

This text of 101 So. 3d 920 (Non-Party Interested Persons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Non-Party Interested Persons v. State, 101 So. 3d 920, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20593, 2012 WL 5968777 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Petitioners have filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari, seeking to prevent the disclosure of two Florida Department of Law Enforcement Investigative Reports.¹ Having carefully reviewed the file and applicable caselaw, we conclude that the documents should not be disseminated and should remain confidential at this time. See § 119.011(3)(c)5.a., Fla. Stat. (2012); Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. Rapp, 997 So.2d 1098 (Fla.2008). The State does not oppose the Petition but is only concerned [921]*921about any admissibility issue that may arise at trial. We do not address its concern because that is a matter for the trial court to decide at trial. Therefore, the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is granted and the July 27, 2012, order is quashed.

PETITION GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED.

ORFINGER, C.J., and SAWAYA and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Petitioners have filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari, seeking to prevent the disclosure of two Florida Department of Law Enforcement Investigative Reports.¹ Having carefully reviewed the file and applicable caselaw, we conclude that the documents should not be disseminated and should remain confidential at this time. See § 119.011(3)(c)5.a., Fla. Stat. (2012); Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. Rapp, 997 So.2d 1098 (Fla.2008). The State does not oppose the Petition but is only concerned [921]*921about any admissibility issue that may arise at trial. We do not address its concern because that is a matter for the trial court to decide at trial. Therefore, the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is granted and the July 27, 2012, order is quashed.

PETITION GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED.

ORFINGER, C.J., and SAWAYA and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 So. 3d 920, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20593, 2012 WL 5968777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/non-party-interested-persons-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack