Noman v. Colonial Indemnity Insurance

206 A.D.2d 848, 616 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7754

This text of 206 A.D.2d 848 (Noman v. Colonial Indemnity Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Noman v. Colonial Indemnity Insurance, 206 A.D.2d 848, 616 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7754 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Because the parties agreed at Supreme Court that there are questions of fact whether the insurance policy had been cancelled before the second of two fires occurred, it was error to grant the motion of plaintiff Suzan Noman for partial summary judgment on liability with respect to the second fire. The order appealed from is therefore modified in that respect and is otherwise affirmed. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.—Partial Summary Judgment.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr, and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 A.D.2d 848, 616 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noman-v-colonial-indemnity-insurance-nyappdiv-1994.