Noman v. Colonial Indemnity Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Noman v. Colonial Indemnity Insurance

206 A.D.2d 848, 616 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7754

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1994·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Because the parties agreed at Supreme Court that there are questions of fact whether the insurance policy had been cancelled before the second of two fires occurred, it was error to grant the motion of plaintiff Suzan Noman for partial summary judgment on liability with respect to the second fire. The order appealed from is therefore modified in that respect and is otherwise affirmed. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.—Partial Summary Judgment.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr, and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Because the parties agreed at Supreme Court that there are questions of fact whether the insurance policy had been cancelled before the second of two fires occurred, it was error to grant the motion of plaintiff Suzan Noman for partial summary judgment on liability with respect to the second fire. The order appealed from is therefore modified in that respect and is otherwise affirmed. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.—Partial Summary Judgment.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr, and Boehm, JJ.

Noman v. Colonial Indemnity Insurance, 206 A.D.2d 848, 616 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7754 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

206 A.D.2d 848 (Noman v. Colonial Indemnity Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.