Nolte v. Nolte

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Nolte v. Nolte

260 So. 2d 321, 261 La. 538, 1972 La. LEXIS 5136

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 18, 1972·No. No. 52283·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in the judgment complained of.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinjon the writ should be granted. The instability of the [540]*540marital- regime, the repetitive remand of these children 'from a secure environment, from 'school, and from their peer relations and the unstable and unsuitable environment..now offered by plaintiff, is sufficient to .establish strong reasons to-deprive plaintiff.! p.f provisional custody. C.C. article 146.. See also my dissent in Estes v. Estes, 1972, 261 La. 20, 258 So.2d 857.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in the judgment complained of.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinjon the writ should be granted. The instability of the [540]*540marital- regime, the repetitive remand of these children 'from a secure environment, from 'school, and from their peer relations and the unstable and unsuitable environment..now offered by plaintiff, is sufficient to .establish strong reasons to-deprive plaintiff.! p.f provisional custody. C.C. article 146.. See also my dissent in Estes v. Estes, 1972, 261 La. 20, 258 So.2d 857.

Nolte v. Nolte, 260 So. 2d 321, 261 La. 538, 1972 La. LEXIS 5136 (La. 1972).

Pincite

260 So. 2d 321 (Nolte v. Nolte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related