Nolte v. Manhattan R'way Co.

32 N.Y. St. Rep. 1138
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedJune 27, 1890
StatusPublished

This text of 32 N.Y. St. Rep. 1138 (Nolte v. Manhattan R'way Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nolte v. Manhattan R'way Co., 32 N.Y. St. Rep. 1138 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).

Opinion

Freedman, J.

The record discloses no error which, under all the circumstances, constitutes ground for reversal, nor can it he held that the verdict is excessive.

The judgment and order should he affirmed, with costs.

Truax, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 N.Y. St. Rep. 1138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nolte-v-manhattan-rway-co-nysuperctnyc-1890.