Noll v. Rosedale Cemetery Ass'n

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Noll v. Rosedale Cemetery Ass'n

109 A. 500, 91 N.J. Eq. 330, 6 Stock. 330, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 294

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 1, 1920·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The present ease is precisely similar in its determining features to Bliss v. Rosedale Cemetery Association, No. 20 of the present term. Por tire reasons stated in the per curiam filed in that case, the decree herein will be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Swayze, Trbnoiiard;, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kausoh, Black, White,. Heepeniteimer, Williams, Taylor. Gardner, Ackerson — 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

The present ease is precisely similar in its determining features to Bliss v. Rosedale Cemetery Association, No. 20 of the present term. Por tire reasons stated in the per curiam filed in that case, the decree herein will be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Swayze, Trbnoiiard;, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kausoh, Black, White,. Heepeniteimer, Williams, Taylor. Gardner, Ackerson — 14.

For reversal — None.

Noll v. Rosedale Cemetery Ass'n, 109 A. 500, 91 N.J. Eq. 330, 6 Stock. 330, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 294 (N.J. 1920).

Pincite

109 A. 500 (Noll v. Rosedale Cemetery Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.