Nolin v. State
64 So. 2d 103, 258 Ala. 589, 1953 Ala. LEXIS 129
Opinion
Petitioner insists that Wiley v. State, 16 Ala.App. 93, 75 So. 641, cited by the Court of Appeals in support of its position, is an authority dealing with § 362; Title 14, Code of 1940, and not § 363, Title 14, Code of 1940. However that may be, the authorities appear to hold that in order to make out a case under § 363, among other things, it is necessary to show that the indebtedness secured by the lien was unpaid. McWhorter v. State, 16 Ala.App. 168, 76 So. 325; Cox v. State, 25 Ala.App. 38, 140 So. 617.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nolin v. State, 64 So. 2d 103, 258 Ala. 589, 1953 Ala. LEXIS 129 (Ala. 1953).
64 So. 2d 103 (Nolin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cook v. State
469 So. 2d 1350 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1985)
Taylor v. State
185 So. 2d 412 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1965)
Farris v. State
130 So. 2d 54 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1960)