Nolfo v. Thompson

214 S.W.3d 409, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 298, 2007 WL 509691
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 20, 2007·No. No. ED 88180·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this wrongful-death action, Louis Nol-fo, the plaintiff, appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants Arthur, Deborah, and Christopher Crossen. Mr. Nolfo contends the trial court erred in entering summary judgment, as he had produced sufficient evidence to prove the existence of a duty on the part of the defendants to protect his son, Andrew, from injury.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nolfo v. Thompson, 214 S.W.3d 409, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 298, 2007 WL 509691 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

214 S.W.3d 409 (Nolfo v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.