Nolfo v. Nolfo

Missouri Court of Appeals

Nolfo v. Nolfo

826 S.W.2d 111, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 586

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 7, 1992·No. No. 60453·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[112]*112ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order dismissing a motion to set aside a decree of dissolution under Rule 74.06(b) and imposing sanctions pursuant to Rule 55.03. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[112]*112ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order dismissing a motion to set aside a decree of dissolution under Rule 74.06(b) and imposing sanctions pursuant to Rule 55.03. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Nolfo v. Nolfo, 826 S.W.2d 111, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 586 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

826 S.W.2d 111 (Nolfo v. Nolfo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related