Nolen v. State
This text of 162 S.W. 869 (Nolen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of the offense of unlawfully carrying a pistol.
The statement of facts which accompanies the record bears no file marks, and does not show when it was filed in the trial court, and under such circumstances we are not authorized to consider it. Yet, we have read it and we feel constrained to say that the trial court was fully authorized to adjudge appellant guilty of the offense charged. A jury was waived and the issue submitted to the court, and if we considered the statement of facts it would authorize the court to arrive at the conclusion at which he did arrive—that appellant was guilty of the offense charged.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 S.W. 869, 72 Tex. Crim. 450, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nolen-v-state-texcrimapp-1913.