Nolen v. Nolen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nolen v. Nolen

221 A.D.2d 540, 635 N.Y.S.2d 481, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11867

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 20, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Sweeny, J.), dated December 23, 1993, which, after a hearing, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the petitioner’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738). Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Sweeny, J.), dated December 23, 1993, which, after a hearing, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the petitioner’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738). Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Nolen v. Nolen, 221 A.D.2d 540, 635 N.Y.S.2d 481, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

221 A.D.2d 540 (Nolen v. Nolen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related