Noland v. Maxey

32 S.W.2d 822, 119 Tex. 462
Texas Supreme Court·Decided November 26, 1930·No. Application No. 17815.·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs in error filed this suit against defendants in error for the purpose of enjoining them from erecting a school building on a certain site selected by the defendants in error as, trustees of a school district. Temporary injunction issued. On appeal to the Court of Civil Appeals at Amarillo, 31 S.W. (2d) 468, the temporary injunction was dissolved and the petition dismissed. The plaintiffs in error, within the time allowed by .law, filed their application for writ of error. However, on the presentation of the matter in this court it has been made to appear that the construction of the schoolhouse has been finished, regardless of the status of the case in the courts. There is therefore nothing for this court to determine. If any wrong has been committed by any one, the consideration of a moot case is not the method of righting that wrong. Because the question involved is •moot, we dismiss the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Noland v. Maxey, 32 S.W.2d 822, 119 Tex. 462 (Tex. 1930).

32 S.W.2d 822 (Noland v. Maxey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Texas Woman's University v. Chayklintaste
530 S.W.2d 927 (Texas Supreme Court, 1975)
Barnett v. Conroe Independent School District
455 S.W.2d 376 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1970)
Boatright v. City of Mineral Wells
415 S.W.2d 901 (Texas Supreme Court, 1967)
Hulett v. West Lamar Rural High School District
232 S.W.2d 669 (Texas Supreme Court, 1950)
Hulett v. Board of Trustees.
229 S.W.2d 839 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1950)
Travis County v. Matthews
221 S.W.2d 347 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1949)
City of West University Place v. Martin
123 S.W.2d 638 (Texas Supreme Court, 1939)