Noland v. Bowen

147 S.E. 513, 168 Ga. 316, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 129
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 14, 1929
DocketNo. 6921
StatusPublished

This text of 147 S.E. 513 (Noland v. Bowen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Noland v. Bowen, 147 S.E. 513, 168 Ga. 316, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 129 (Ga. 1929).

Opinion

Hines, J.

Kitchens applied to the building inspector of the City of Atlanta for a permit to build an apartment-house in a district which had been zoned under the ordinances of the city for residential purposes. The inspector granted the permit. Noland and others appealed to the board of zoning appeals of the city. This board declined “to grant the appeal, in view of the decisions of the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia relating to the zoning ordinances of the City of Atlanta.” Thereupon the appellants petitioned the superior court of Fulton County for the writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the board of zoning appeals. The judge to whom the petition was presented declined to sanction it. The appellants sued out the present writ of error to review said judgment.

[317]*317This court has jurisdiction only in cases which involve the construction of the constitution of the State of Georgia, or ol the United States; treaties between the United States and foreign governments; cases in which the constitutionality of any law of the State of Georgia or of the United States is drawn in question; and, until otherwise provided by law, all cases respecting title to land; all equity cases; all cases which involve the validity or construction of wills; all cases of conviction of a capital felony; all habeascorpus cases; all cases involving extraordinary remedies; all divorce and alimony cases; and all cases certified to it by the Court of Appeals for its determination. Acts 1916, p. 19; 10 Park’s Code Supp. 1922, § 6502. This court is without jurisdiction to review the judgment of the judge of the superior court refusing to sanction the petition for certiorari in this case, the same not falling within any of the above subjects over which this court has jurisdiction. The case is therefore

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
147 S.E. 513, 168 Ga. 316, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noland-v-bowen-ga-1929.