Nolan v. VILLAGE OF MARVIN

625 S.E.2d 551, 2005 N.C. LEXIS 1541, 2005 WL 3593856
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nolan v. VILLAGE OF MARVIN. Read the opinion of the Court — 360 N.C. 256
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 30, 2005·No. 488A05·Published

Opinion

625 S.E.2d 551 (2005)

NOLAN
v.
VILLAGE OF MARVIN.

No. 488A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 30, 2005.

Robert E. Hornik, Jr., Chapel Hill, for William J. Nolan, III, et al.

Anthony Fox, Benjamin R. Sullivan, Charlotte, for Village of Marvin.

Lydia Boesch, for Residents of Pinewild Farms, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th day of November 2005 by Residents of Pinewild Farms, et al for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of November 2005."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nolan v. VILLAGE OF MARVIN, 625 S.E.2d 551, 2005 N.C. LEXIS 1541, 2005 WL 3593856 (N.C. 2005).

625 S.E.2d 551 (Nolan v. VILLAGE OF MARVIN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.