Nolan v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Nolan v. State

842 S.W.2d 576, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1857, 1992 WL 365527

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nolan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1229 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 15, 1992·No. No. 61547·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion following an evidentia-ry hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion following an evidentia-ry hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Nolan v. State, 842 S.W.2d 576, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1857, 1992 WL 365527 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

842 S.W.2d 576 (Nolan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.