Nolan v. Nolan
This text of 177 S.E. 248 (Nolan v. Nolan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where on application for temporary alimony and attorney’s fees the evidence is conflicting, the discretion of the judge in allowing such amounts of alimony and fees as seem reasonable and appropriate will not be disturbed by this court. Heaton v. Heaton, 102 Ga. 578 (27 S. E. 677); Kelly v. Kelly, 146 Ga. 362 (91 S. E. 120); Ethridge v. Ethridge, 149 Ga. 44 (99 S. E. 37); Caswell v. Caswell, ante, 676 (177 S. E. —). Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 S.E. 248, 179 Ga. 677, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nolan-v-nolan-ga-1934.