Nolan v. Nolan

177 S.E. 248, 179 Ga. 677, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 371
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 14, 1934·No. No. 10384·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Hutcheson, J.

Where on application for temporary alimony and attorney’s fees the evidence is conflicting, the discretion of the judge in allowing such amounts of alimony and fees as seem reasonable and appropriate will not be disturbed by this court. Heaton v. Heaton, 102 Ga. 578 (27 S. E. 677); Kelly v. Kelly, 146 Ga. 362 (91 S. E. 120); Ethridge v. Ethridge, 149 Ga. 44 (99 S. E. 37); Caswell v. Caswell, ante, 676 (177 S. E. —). Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. H. A. Allen and J. Wilson Parker, for plaintiff in error. Pilis G. Arnall and A. H. Freeman, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nolan v. Nolan, 177 S.E. 248, 179 Ga. 677, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 371 (Ga. 1934).

177 S.E. 248 (Nolan v. Nolan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baca v. Baca
568 S.E.2d 746 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2002)
Moody v. Moody
19 S.E.2d 504 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Williams v. Williams
182 S.E. 904 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)