Nolan v. Mizrahi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nolan v. Mizrahi

12 A.D.3d 430, 783 N.Y.S.2d 849, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13294

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 8, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 12 A.D.3d 430 (Nolan v. Mizrahi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nolan v. Mizrahi, 12 A.D.3d 430, 783 N.Y.S.2d 849, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13294 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated May 10, 2004, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries arising from a motor vehicle accident during which the front of her vehicle came into contact with the passenger side of the defendant’s vehicle at an intersection. The defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the [431]*431complaint. In support of his motion, the defendant established a prima face entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by presenting evidence that the plaintiff failed to yield the right-of-way after stopping at a stop sign (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1142 [a]; Morgan v Hachmann, 9 AD3d 400 [2004]; Meliarenne v Prisco, 9 AD3d 353 [2004]; Willis v Fink, 7 AD3d 519 [2004]; Meretskaya v Logozzo, 2 AD3d 599 [2003]; Yusupov v Lugo, 305 AD2d 496 [2003]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Ritter, J.P., Smith, Goldstein and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated May 10, 2004, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries arising from a motor vehicle accident during which the front of her vehicle came into contact with the passenger side of the defendant’s vehicle at an intersection. The defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the [431]*431complaint. In support of his motion, the defendant established a prima face entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by presenting evidence that the plaintiff failed to yield the right-of-way after stopping at a stop sign (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1142 [a]; Morgan v Hachmann, 9 AD3d 400 [2004]; Meliarenne v Prisco, 9 AD3d 353 [2004]; Willis v Fink, 7 AD3d 519 [2004]; Meretskaya v Logozzo, 2 AD3d 599 [2003]; Yusupov v Lugo, 305 AD2d 496 [2003]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Ritter, J.P., Smith, Goldstein and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.3d 430, 783 N.Y.S.2d 849, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nolan-v-mizrahi-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack