Nolan v. MEYNERS-ROBINSON COMPANY, INC.

268 S.E.2d 656, 246 Ga. 49, 1980 Ga. LEXIS 1012
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 17, 1980·No. 36150·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Undercofler, Chief Justice.

This case is controlled by Durham v. Stand-By Labor of Georgia, Inc., 230 Ga. 558 (198 SE2d 145) (1973), where we held that although noncompetition clauses in employment contracts may not be enforceable, Richard P. Rita Personnel Services International v. Kot, 229 Ga. 314 (191 SE2d 79) (1972), nondisclosure clauses in the same contract could be separately enforced under a reasonableness test. The trial court here found the noncompetition clause too broad and unenforceable, but held that the nondisclosure clause reasonably restricted use of the former employer’s customer list for three years. Accordingly, it enjoined the employee from calling on nine customers proved by the employer to have been learned by the employee as a result of their working relationship. We affirm.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nolan v. MEYNERS-ROBINSON COMPANY, INC., 268 S.E.2d 656, 246 Ga. 49, 1980 Ga. LEXIS 1012 (Ga. 1980).

268 S.E.2d 656 (Nolan v. MEYNERS-ROBINSON COMPANY, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related