Nolan v. MEYNERS-ROBINSON COMPANY, INC.
This text of 268 S.E.2d 656 (Nolan v. MEYNERS-ROBINSON COMPANY, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is controlled by Durham v. Stand-By Labor of Georgia, Inc., 230 Ga. 558 (198 SE2d 145) (1973), where we held that although noncompetition clauses in employment contracts may not be enforceable, Richard P. Rita Personnel Services International v. Kot, 229 Ga. 314 (191 SE2d 79) (1972), nondisclosure clauses in the same contract could be separately enforced under a reasonableness test. The trial court here found the noncompetition clause too broad and unenforceable, but held that the nondisclosure clause reasonably restricted use of the former employer’s customer list for three years. Accordingly, it enjoined the employee from calling on nine customers proved by the employer to have been learned by the employee as a result of their working relationship. We affirm.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 S.E.2d 656, 246 Ga. 49, 1980 Ga. LEXIS 1012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nolan-v-meyners-robinson-company-inc-ga-1980.