Nolan v. Lewis

New York Court of Common Pleas

Nolan v. Lewis

28 N.Y.S. 1137, 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 389

DecidedApril 2, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 28 N.Y.S. 1137 (Nolan v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nolan v. Lewis, 28 N.Y.S. 1137, 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 389 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff sued for the value of services rendered him to the defendant in the capacity of attorney and counselor. As to the fact of plaintiff’s employment by defendant, the record discloses a conflict of evidence with which we have nothing to do. That the services in question were performed is not disputed, and we find no reason for holding that the sum of $100, as found by the justice to be the reasonable value thereof, is excessive. No questions of law are presented by the record. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff sued for the value of services rendered him to the defendant in the capacity of attorney and counselor. As to the fact of plaintiff’s employment by defendant, the record discloses a conflict of evidence with which we have nothing to do. That the services in question were performed is not disputed, and we find no reason for holding that the sum of $100, as found by the justice to be the reasonable value thereof, is excessive. No questions of law are presented by the record. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 N.Y.S. 1137, 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nolan-v-lewis-nyctcompl-1894.