Nolan v. J.C.S. Realty, LLC
This text of 79 A.D.3d 414 (Nolan v. J.C.S. Realty, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Judith J. Gische, J.), entered February 8, 2010, which, inter alia, granted defendant J.C.S. Realty’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence causes of action as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The record demonstrates that defendant timely served its motion (see Azcona v Salem, 49 AD3d 343 [2008]). In any event, the motion court could consider the motion to the extent that it addressed the same issues that were the subject of defendant TeleVast’s undisputedly timely motion (Wilinski v 334 E. 92nd Hous. Dev. Fund Corp., 71 AD3d 538, 540 [2010]).
Defendant demonstrated that it exercised no supervisory control over the activity that brought about plaintiff’s injury (see Comes v New York State Elec. & Gas Corp., 82 NY2d 876 [1993]).
There is no evidence that J.C. Studios and defendant J.C.S. Realty did not operate as separate corporate entities (see [415]*415Figueiredo v New Palace Painters Supply Co. Inc., 39 AD3d 363, 364 [2007]).
We have reviewed plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them without merit. Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, DeGrasse, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 A.D.3d 414, 910 N.Y.S.2d 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nolan-v-jcs-realty-llc-nyappdiv-2010.