Nolan v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.

11 F.R.D. 194, 1951 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3588
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJanuary 18, 1951
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 11 F.R.D. 194 (Nolan v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nolan v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 11 F.R.D. 194, 1951 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3588 (S.D.N.Y. 1951).

Opinion

WEINFELD, District Judge.

Motion for permission to -serve an amended complaint as proposed is granted. Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. provides that such leave shall be freely given when justice so requires.

Plaintiff moved promptly to eliminate its prayer for injunctive relief and an accounting when it discovered during the taking of the defendant’s deposition that the alleged infringing program was on a sustaining basis and that the defendant did not gain [195]*195profits therefrom. It is no sufficient objection to the amendment that its purpose is to secure a jury trial. Certainly defendant’s rights are not prejudiced by the granting of this motion. Pallant v. Sinatra, D.C., 7 F.R.D. 293; Fischer & Porter Co. v. Brooks Rotameter Co., D.C., 86 F.Supp. 502; Lieberman v. Merkin, D.C., 2 F.R.D. 315.

Settle order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fox v. SHANNON & LUCHS COMPANY OF WASHINGTON
236 A.2d 60 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 F.R.D. 194, 1951 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nolan-v-columbia-broadcasting-system-inc-nysd-1951.