Nolan v. Calhoun

143 S.E. 606, 38 Ga. App. 227, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 151
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 12, 1928
Docket18625
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 143 S.E. 606 (Nolan v. Calhoun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nolan v. Calhoun, 143 S.E. 606, 38 Ga. App. 227, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 151 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinions

Pee Curiam.

This case is controlled by that of Gody v. Automobile Financing Inc., 37 Ga. App. 452 (140 S. E. 634) ; and tinder the rulings there made, the court in the instant case erred in admitting the evidence which directly contradicted the express provisions of the written contract. See also Hadden v. Williams, 37 Ga. App. 464 (140 S. E. 797).

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, G, J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. ■ Luhe, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Southeastern Greyhound Lines Inc. v. Fisher
34 S.E.2d 906 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)
Peck v. Harris
144 S.E. 683 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 S.E. 606, 38 Ga. App. 227, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nolan-v-calhoun-gactapp-1928.