Nolan (Ricky) v. State
This text of Nolan (Ricky) v. State (Nolan (Ricky) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RICKY NOLAN, No. 78630 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. FILED MAY 2 2 2019 EL BROWN / CLERK ?At couRr - BY ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL PUTICLERK
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion to rule on a post-conviction petition requesting genetic marker analysis. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; James M. Bixler, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion to rule on a post-conviction petition requesting genetic marker analysis, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v, State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
, J. Pickering
PiatijiCiej Parraguirre trri Cadish •
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA ler 7-2311 (0) (94Th cc: Chief Judge, The Eighth Judicial District Court Hon. James M. Bixler, Senior Judge Ricky Nolan Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A saii.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nolan (Ricky) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nolan-ricky-v-state-nev-2019.