Nolan (Ricky) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided May 22, 2019·No. 78630·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

RICKY NOLAN, No. 78630 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Respondent.

FILED MAY 2 2 2019 EL BROWN / CLERK ?At couRr

-

BY

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL PUTICLERK

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion to rule on a post-conviction petition requesting genetic marker analysis. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; James M. Bixler, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion to rule on a post-conviction petition requesting genetic marker analysis, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v, State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

, J.

Pickering

PiatijiCiej Parraguirre

trri

Cadish

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA ler 7-2311

(0) (94Th cc: Chief Judge, The Eighth Judicial District Court Hon. James M. Bixler, Senior Judge Ricky Nolan Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A saii.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nolan (Ricky) v. State, (Neb. 2019).

Nolan (Ricky) v. State (Nolan (Ricky) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)