Nolan, David Glenn v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: July 18, 2002
• Docket: 14-01-01016-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

Affirmed and Opinion filed July 18, 2002

Affirmed and Opinion filed July 18, 2002.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NOS. 14-01-01014-CR &

      14-01-01016-CR

DAVID GLENN NOLAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_______________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 183rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 863,157 & 862,773

M E M O R A N D U M  O P I N I O N

            Appellant entered pleas of guilty to two counts of impersonating a public servant.  The jury sentenced appellant to confinement for ten years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and a ten thousand dollar fine on each count.  Appellant filed pro se notices of appeal.

            Appellant’s appointed counsel filed briefs in which he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit.  The briefs meet the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), by presenting a professional

evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

            A copy of counsel’s brief in each cause number was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  As of this date, no pro se response has been filed.

            We have carefully reviewed the records and counsel’s briefs and agree that the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no reversible error in the records.  A discussion of the briefs would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.

            Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

                                                                        PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Opinion filed July 18, 2002.

Panel consists of Justices Hudson, Fowler, and Edelman.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.3(b).