Noirmot v. Rosemary

Fourth Circuit

Noirmot v. Rosemary

9 F.2d 982, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2498

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 23, 1925

DocketNo. 2436

StatusPublished

This text of 9 F.2d 982 (Noirmot v. Rosemary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Noirmot v. Rosemary, 9 F.2d 982, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2498 (4th Cir. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the testimony and the oral and printed arguments. We are satisfied that the amount awarded by the deeree helow to the libelant Noirmot is ample to cover all claims he has against the respondents or either of them. We are not prepared to say it is excessive. We believe that the learned court below was right in holding that the other libelants had failed to establish any ground for recovery.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the testimony and the oral and printed arguments. We are satisfied that the amount awarded by the deeree helow to the libelant Noirmot is ample to cover all claims he has against the respondents or either of them. We are not prepared to say it is excessive. We believe that the learned court below was right in holding that the other libelants had failed to establish any ground for recovery.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 F.2d 982, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noirmot-v-rosemary-ca4-1925.