Noh v. United States

Opinion

1 2 3 4

5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 JEANE HEEKYUNG NOH, 9 Plaintiff, Case No. C24-2086-TL 10 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 12 Defendants. 13

14 Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in the above-entitled 15 action. (Dkt. # 1.) In the IFP application, Plaintiff reports she received $17,633.00 in the last 16 twelve months, has no cash on hand, but has $3,900.00 in a checking account and $23,000.00 in 17 savings, and has monthly expenses of $1,150.00. (Id. at 1-2.) Plaintiff provides no additional 18 information to explain why she cannot pay court fees and costs. (See id. at 2.) 19 The district court may permit indigent litigants to proceed IFP upon completion of a 20 proper affidavit of indigence. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). “To qualify for in forma pauperis status, 21 a civil litigant must demonstrate both that the litigant is unable to pay court fees and that the 22 claims he or she seeks to pursue are not frivolous.” Ogunsalu v. Nair, 117 F. App’x 522, 523 23 (9th Cir. 2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1051 (2005). To meet the first prong of this test, a litigant 1 must show that he or she “cannot because of his [or her] poverty pay or give security for the 2 costs and still be able to provide him[ or her]self and dependents with the necessities of life.” 3 Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948) (internal alterations 4 omitted).

5 Plaintiff’s application omits information necessary for the Court to determine her ability 6 to pay court fees and costs. Plaintiff does not explain why she cannot use some of her savings to 7 pay the filing fee of $405.00. (Dkt. # 1 at 2.) Under these circumstances, Plaintiff should not be 8 authorized to proceed IFP. 9 Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause by December 27, 2024, why the 10 Court should not recommend her IFP application be denied. Alternatively, Plaintiff may submit 11 an amended IFP application by that date, explaining her circumstances more fully. The Clerk is 12 directed to renote Plaintiff’s IFP application (dkt. # 1) for December 27, 2024, and to send copies 13 of this order to Plaintiff and to the Honorable Tana Lin. 14 Dated this 19th day of December, 2024.

15 A 16 MICHELLE L. PETERSON United States Magistrate Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23