Noger v. State

516 So. 2d 1080, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2907, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11629, 1987 WL 2899
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 16, 1987
DocketNo. 86-1964
StatusPublished

This text of 516 So. 2d 1080 (Noger v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Noger v. State, 516 So. 2d 1080, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2907, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11629, 1987 WL 2899 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Although appellant’s sentencing guidelines scoresheet warranted a sentence in the nine to twelve year range, the court sentenced appellant to thirty years in prison. The court’s written reason for departure was that appellant failed to appear at his sentencing hearing in violation of a condition of a plea agreement.

Under Williams v. State, 500 So.2d 501 (Fla.1986), “departing from the guidelines because a defendant has failed to appear is not permissible as it does not constitute a clear and convincing reason for departure.” Id. at 502.

Because the court departed specifically for this reason, the state concedes, and we agree, that this court should vacate appellant’s thirty year sentence and remand to the trial court for sentencing within the guidelines range.

Sentence vacated; remanded for resen-tencing in accord with this opinion.

SCHEB, Acting C.J., and CAMPBELL and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
500 So. 2d 501 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
516 So. 2d 1080, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2907, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11629, 1987 WL 2899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noger-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.