Noell v. State

193 So. 3d 1016, 2016 WL 3421475, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8854
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 3, 2016
DocketNo. 1D15-5352
StatusPublished

This text of 193 So. 3d 1016 (Noell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Noell v. State, 193 So. 3d 1016, 2016 WL 3421475, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8854 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm, in part, the denial of the appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. However, we remand for the trial court to strike the appellant’s designation as a sexual offender for count II (unlawful use of a two-way communications device) on the written judgment and sentence, as that offense does not qualify for sexual offender designation under section 943,0435(l)(a)l., Florida Statutes (2012). Because it is a ministerial act, the appellant need not be present. See Bauder v. State, 983 So.2d 1244 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED in part with directions.

ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS and RAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bauder v. State
983 So. 2d 1244 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 So. 3d 1016, 2016 WL 3421475, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noell-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.