Noel v. The City of New York

S.D. New York

Noel v. The City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided January 28, 2025·No. 1:23-cv-03082·Unknown

Opinion

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DATE FILED: 1/28/2025 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GORDON NOEL, Plaintiff, 23-cv-3082 (MKV) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a joint letter filed by Defendant on behalf of the parties informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle. [ECF No. 85]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by February 27, 2025. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED. | / ls Date: January 28, 2025 syskocn New York, NY United Statés District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DATE FILED: 1/28/2025 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GORDON NOEL, Plaintiff, 23-cv-3082 (MKV) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a joint letter filed by Defendant on behalf of the parties informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle. [ECF No. 85]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by February 27, 2025. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED. | / ls Date: January 28, 2025 syskocn New York, NY United Statés District Judge

Noel v. The City of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Pincite

Noel v. The City of New York (Noel v. The City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related