Noel v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Noel v. State

851 S.W.2d 689, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 377, 1993 WL 73910

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 16, 1993·No. No. 61675·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. After reviewing the record, we find the motion court did not clearly err in such denial. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b).

We further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion in this matter and dispose by summary order. Rule 30.25(b). We have provided the parties with a memorandum, for their use only, setting forth our reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. After reviewing the record, we find the motion court did not clearly err in such denial. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b).

We further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion in this matter and dispose by summary order. Rule 30.25(b). We have provided the parties with a memorandum, for their use only, setting forth our reasons for our decision.

Noel v. State, 851 S.W.2d 689, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 377, 1993 WL 73910 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

851 S.W.2d 689 (Noel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.