Noel v. State

117 So. 3d 1140, 2012 WL 6682013, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21992
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Noel v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18880
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 26, 2012·No. No. 3D11-2778·Published

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

ROTHENBERG, J.

The defendant, Mark Noel, appeals the denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal as to his conviction for first-degree criminal mischief. Noel contends that to sustain a conviction for first-degree criminal mischief, the State was required to prove that the damage to the subject property, which in this case was the victim’s vehicle, was greater than $200. He further submits that the State failed to prove by competent substantial evidence that the damage exceeded $200, and thus this Court should reverse his conviction for first-degree criminal mischief and remand for the entry of judgment for the reduced crime of second-degree criminal mischief. We agree. Based on our independent review, and the State’s proper confession of error, we conclude there was insufficient evidence to establish that the damage exceeded $200. We, therefore, reverse Noel’s conviction for first-degree criminal mischief and remand with instructions to enter judgment for the reduced crime of second-degree criminal mischief. Noel’s remaining convictions and sentences should not be disturbed.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Noel v. State, 117 So. 3d 1140, 2012 WL 6682013, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21992 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

117 So. 3d 1140 (Noel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.