Noel v. Noel
This text of 271 N.W. 217 (Noel v. Noel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff brought an action for divorce alleging habitual intemperance and willful neglect, and was awarded judgment. The question presented on appeal is whether or not the evidence sustains the findings of fact. We are of the opinion that the evidence is sufficient and that there is no prejudicial error in the record. The judgment and order appealed from are therefore affirmed.
All the Judges concur. *Page 92
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 N.W. 217, 65 S.D. 91, 1937 S.D. LEXIS 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noel-v-noel-sd-1937.