Noel v. Karper

53 Pa. 97, 1866 Pa. LEXIS 168
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 25, 1866·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered, by

Read, J.

The charge of the court states the law with great clearness and precision, and no exception is taken to any part except to the answer to the defendant’s 5th point, and we think the answer itself was perfectly proper, for it submitted to the jury whether the defendant understood the contents of the notes which he signed and upon which this suit was brought.

We also think there was no error in-rejecting -the testimony which forms the 1st and 2d specifications of error, as it was clearly irrelevant.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Noel v. Karper, 53 Pa. 97, 1866 Pa. LEXIS 168 (Pa. 1866).

53 Pa. 97 (Noel v. Karper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mulholland v. Pittsburgh National Bank
174 A.2d 861 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1961)
United States v. Koenig
144 F. Supp. 22 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1956)
Morgan v. Continental Credit Corp.
58 Pa. D. & C. 620 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1947)
Mulholland v. Sterling Motor Truck Co.
164 A. 597 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)