Noe v. Wolf
This text of 243 A.D. 542 (Noe v. Wolf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action to recover damages for the death of plaintiffs’ intestate through the negligence, as alleged, of defendant in the use and administration of an anaesthetic. Appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiffs’ case. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event. In our opinion, plaintiffs made out a prima facie ease and were entitled to have the court submit to the jury the question of defendant’s negligence in permitting chloroform to be used as the anaesthetic and in directing the anaesthetist in the “ pouring ” of the chloroform. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
243 A.D. 542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noe-v-wolf-nyappdiv-1934.