Noe v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
599 So. 2d 786, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7279, 1992 WL 139201
This text of 599 So. 2d 786 (Noe v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Noe v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 599 So. 2d 786, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7279, 1992 WL 139201 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
Opinion
We reverse the trial court’s order that granted appellees’ motion to stay and compelled arbitration on the authority of Montgomery Distributors, Inc. v. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc., 505 So.2d 443 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). We reject appellees’ argument that subsequent federal cases require us to depart from the holding expressed in Montgomery Distributors.
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Montgomery Distrib., Inc. v. G. Heileman Brewing Co.
505 So. 2d 443 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
599 So. 2d 786, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7279, 1992 WL 139201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noe-v-dean-witter-reynolds-inc-fladistctapp-1992.