Noe v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.

599 So. 2d 786, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7279, 1992 WL 139201
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 24, 1992·No. No. 92-0679·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order that granted appellees’ motion to stay and compelled arbitration on the authority of Montgomery Distributors, Inc. v. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc., 505 So.2d 443 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). We reject appellees’ argument that subsequent federal cases require us to depart from the holding expressed in Montgomery Distributors.

REVERSED.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and DELL and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Noe v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 599 So. 2d 786, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7279, 1992 WL 139201 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

599 So. 2d 786 (Noe v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Montgomery Distrib., Inc. v. G. Heileman Brewing Co.
505 So. 2d 443 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)