Noe Perez-Hernandez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
This text of 585 F. App'x 564 (Noe Perez-Hernandez v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM *
Noe Perez-Hernandez challenges the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision upholding the immigration judge’s order finding him removable under section 237(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(B)(i), based on his conviction for offering to transport a controlled substance under Nevada Revised Statutes § 453.321. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D), and we REMAND.
Following its decision in this case, the BIA decided In re Davey, 26 I. & N. Dec. 37, 40 (BIA 2012), in which it “conclude[d] that for purposes of section 237(a)(2)(B)(i), a crime ‘involves’ possession of 30 grams or less of marijuana for personal use if the particular acts that led to the alien’s conviction were closely related to such conduct.” Given that the Fourth Amended Information charged Perez-Hernandez with offering to transport 30 grams or less of marijuana for his own use, we remand for reconsideration in light of In re Davey.
PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
585 F. App'x 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noe-perez-hernandez-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2014.