Nodine v. Boston, Worcester & New York Street Railway Co.
This text of 240 A.D. 769 (Nodine v. Boston, Worcester & New York Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment as reduced pursuant to stipulation and order in so far as appealed from affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Young and Kapper, JJ., dissent and vote for reversal and a new trial on the ground that the finding of the jury that the neurogenic sarcoma was caused by plaintiff’s injury is against the weight of the evidence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 A.D. 769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nodine-v-boston-worcester-new-york-street-railway-co-nyappdiv-1933.