Nodal-Tarafa v. ARDC Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nodal-Tarafa v. ARDC Corp.

579 So. 2d 414, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5164, 1991 WL 87262

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 28, 1991·No. No. 90-2389·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final order which dismisses with prejudice the plaintiff Rodolfo Nodal-Tara-fa’s claim for tortious interference with an employment relationship as contained in his third amended complaint is affirmed upon a holding that after being given numerous opportunities to amend, the plaintiff was unable to state any operative facts in the amended complaint detailing the specific acts the defendant ARDC Corporation [ARDC] allegedly committed which caused the plaintiff to be discharged as a real estate salesman for Arvida Realty Sales, Inc. Only ultimate legal conclusions are stated therein and such allegations are patently insufficient to state a cause of action against the defendant ARDC, Clark v. Boeing Co., 395 So.2d 1226, 1229 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.110(b).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The final order which dismisses with prejudice the plaintiff Rodolfo Nodal-Tara-fa’s claim for tortious interference with an employment relationship as contained in his third amended complaint is affirmed upon a holding that after being given numerous opportunities to amend, the plaintiff was unable to state any operative facts in the amended complaint detailing the specific acts the defendant ARDC Corporation [ARDC] allegedly committed which caused the plaintiff to be discharged as a real estate salesman for Arvida Realty Sales, Inc. Only ultimate legal conclusions are stated therein and such allegations are patently insufficient to state a cause of action against the defendant ARDC, Clark v. Boeing Co., 395 So.2d 1226, 1229 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.110(b).

Affirmed.

Nodal-Tarafa v. ARDC Corp., 579 So. 2d 414, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5164, 1991 WL 87262 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

579 So. 2d 414 (Nodal-Tarafa v. ARDC Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related