Nod-Away Co. v. Woehr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nod-Away Co. v. Woehr

209 A.D. 907

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1924

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 209 A.D. 907 (Nod-Away Co. v. Woehr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nod-Away Co. v. Woehr, 209 A.D. 907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the City Court of Yonkers reversed on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. The learned trial judge refused to consider the question of depreciation because there was no evidence in the record of the cost of construction of the buildings. In this we think he was in error. The court had power on satisfactory proof of depreciation to allow a sum therefor based upon the assessed valuation of the buildings. (Laws of 1922, chap. 644, § 4a.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the City Court of Yonkers reversed on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. The learned trial judge refused to consider the question of depreciation because there was no evidence in the record of the cost of construction of the buildings. In this we think he was in error. The court had power on satisfactory proof of depreciation to allow a sum therefor based upon the assessed valuation of the buildings. (Laws of 1922, chap. 644, § 4a.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 A.D. 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nod-away-co-v-woehr-nyappdiv-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack