Nod-Away Co. v. Woehr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nod-Away Co. v. Woehr

209 A.D. 907

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1924·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment of the City Court of Yonkers reversed on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. The learned trial judge refused to consider the question of depreciation because there was no evidence in the record of the cost of construction of the buildings. In this we think he was in error. The court had power on satisfactory proof of depreciation to allow a sum therefor based upon the assessed valuation of the buildings. (Laws of 1922, chap. 644, § 4a.)

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the City Court of Yonkers reversed on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. The learned trial judge refused to consider the question of depreciation because there was no evidence in the record of the cost of construction of the buildings. In this we think he was in error. The court had power on satisfactory proof of depreciation to allow a sum therefor based upon the assessed valuation of the buildings. (Laws of 1922, chap. 644, § 4a.)

Footnotes

Nod-Away Co. v. Woehr, 209 A.D. 907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

209 A.D. 907 (Nod-Away Co. v. Woehr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related