Nocera, Inc. v. Asi Acquisition Corp.
This text of 139 F. App'x 886 (Nocera, Inc. v. Asi Acquisition Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Appellants ASI Acquisition Corporation, Robert L. Cashman, Karen Fowler and Trade Leasing, Inc. appeal the district court’s order denying their emergency motion to set aside the default judgment entered against them. Our review of the record below leads us to the conclusion that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied appellants’ motion, see Franchise Holding II, LLC v. Huntington Rests. Group, Inc., 375 F.3d 922, 927 n. 4 (9th Cir.2004), cert. denied, — U.S. ——, 125 S.Ct. 1704, 161 L.Ed.2d 526 (2005); accordingly, we affirm the district court.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 F. App'x 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nocera-inc-v-asi-acquisition-corp-ca9-2005.