Nobrega v. Pittsylvania County Sheriff's Office
This text of 131 F. App'x 917 (Nobrega v. Pittsylvania County Sheriff's Office) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Shawn Alan Nobrega appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 [918]*918U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Nobrega v. Pittsylvania County Sheriff’s Office, No. CA-05-127-SGW (W.D.Va. March 3 & March 17, 2005). We deny Nobrega’s motions for appointment of counsel, for a new trial, and to strike prior criminal record from other states. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
131 F. App'x 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nobrega-v-pittsylvania-county-sheriffs-office-ca4-2005.