Nobles v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Nobles v. State

115 S.W.2d 688, 134 Tex. Crim. 382, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 376

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nobles v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 Tex. Crim. 514 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 9, 1938·No. No. 19514.·Published

Opinions

The offense is receiving and concealing stolen property; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of three years.

The indictment appears regular. The evidence heard before the trial court is not brought up for review. No complaints of the procedure have been presented by bills of exception.

No error having been perceived justifying a reversal of the conviction, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The offense is receiving and concealing stolen property; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of three years.

The indictment appears regular. The evidence heard before the trial court is not brought up for review. No complaints of the procedure have been presented by bills of exception.

No error having been perceived justifying a reversal of the conviction, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

Nobles v. State, 115 S.W.2d 688, 134 Tex. Crim. 382, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 376 (Tex. 1938).

Pincite

115 S.W.2d 688 (Nobles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.