Nobles v. Carlin America, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Nobles v. Carlin America, Inc.

1 F. App'x 136

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 8, 2001·No. No. 00-1984·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William M. Nobles appeals the district court’s order applying the doctrine of lach-es to his claim and entering summary judgment in favor of the Defendants. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reason[137] ing of the district court. Nobles v. Carlin America, Inc., No. CA-99-98-4 H (E.D.N.C. June 20, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

William M. Nobles appeals the district court’s order applying the doctrine of lach-es to his claim and entering summary judgment in favor of the Defendants. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reason[137] ing of the district court. Nobles v. Carlin America, Inc., No. CA-99-98-4 H (E.D.N.C. June 20, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Nobles v. Carlin America, Inc., 1 F. App'x 136 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

1 F. App'x 136 (Nobles v. Carlin America, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.