Noble v. Williams

150 S.W. 507, 150 Ky. 439, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 907
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedNovember 7, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 150 S.W. 507 (Noble v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Noble v. Williams, 150 S.W. 507, 150 Ky. 439, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 907 (Ky. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Winn —

Affirming.

According to tlie allegations of the petition the appellants, the plaintiffs, were hired to teach the public school in Jackson, Kentucky, for the fall term of 1908. The school board failed to pay rent for the schoolhouse, to buy the coal, to furnish the seats, crayons, blackboards, and the like, incident and necessary to the conduct of the school. Plaintiffs allege that they, in order to conduct the school, were obliged to and did pay the rent and buy the supplies. They allege no request by the school board that they should do so, nor any promise by the board to reimburse them. They sought to recover nevertheless, against the appellee board for these expenditures. The circuit court sustained a demurrer to their petition, and they appeal.

The circuit court was right. The teachers, in contracting and paying these obligations, were volunteers. No man entirely of his own volition, can make another his debtor. The school board could have been required by mandamus, at the suit of any proper party, to furnish a place for the conduct of the school. The teachers had no right to supply it themselves, and then recover the rent. They had their teaching contract; and if the board made it impossible for them to teach by failing to furnish a place for conducting the school, they had their right of action on their contract, subject to the custom[440]*440ary principles involved in such cases.1 ■ They adopted neither of these courses, but instead voluntarily paid an obligation which was not theirs.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harwood v. Dysart Consolidated School District
21 N.W.2d 334 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1946)
Rosario v. Gallardo
65 P.R. 53 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1945)
Bruggeman v. Ind. Sch. Dist.
289 N.W. 5 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1939)
Bruggeman v. Independent School District No. 4, Union Township
227 Iowa 661 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1939)
Bell County v. Minton
40 S.W.2d 379 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1931)
Abrams v. Jackson County Board of Education
18 S.W.2d 1000 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1929)
Dejarnett v. Tutt
18 S.W.2d 968 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1929)
Causey v. Cohron
287 S.W. 544 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 S.W. 507, 150 Ky. 439, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noble-v-williams-kyctapp-1912.