Noble v. Township of Paris

22 N.W. 321, 56 Mich. 219
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 30, 1885·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Campbell, J.

Delators asked for a mandamus to compel the respondent to pay two town orders, which were signed by the town clerk and supervisor and made payable to William Beimann, the clerk, and endorsed by him to relators. [220]*220The respondent’s answer shows that the orders were fraudulently issued without consideration, and without any allowance by the proper authorities. No issue was made in the case beyond the petition and return and there is nothing in the case to overcome the answer. •

This being so, the relators’ case is completely met, and théy are not entitled to relief.

Mandamus must be denied with costs.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Noble v. Township of Paris, 22 N.W. 321, 56 Mich. 219 (Mich. 1885).

22 N.W. 321 (Noble v. Township of Paris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seaboard Surety Co. v. State Savings Bank of Ann Arbor
11 N.W.2d 321 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1943)
Keeler v. Deo
75 N.W. 145 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1898)