Noble v. State
This text of 962 So. 2d 360 (Noble v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Darrick NOBLE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nancy C. Wear, Coral Gables, for appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Laura Fisher Zibura, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm all issues except the imposition of costs. Costs may be reimposed on remand if the procedural safeguards required by Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111, 114 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) are met. We note, however, that the expense to be incurred for a new hearing may outweigh the costs sought by the state. Ortiz v. State, 884 So.2d 77 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).
WARNER, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
962 So. 2d 360, 2007 WL 2043444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noble-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.