Noble v. State

962 So. 2d 360, 2007 WL 2043444
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 18, 2007·No. 4D06-1087·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

962 So.2d 360 (2007)

Darrick NOBLE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D06-1087.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 18, 2007.
Rehearing Denied August 28, 2007.

Nancy C. Wear, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Laura Fisher Zibura, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm all issues except the imposition of costs. Costs may be reimposed on remand if the procedural safeguards required by Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111, 114 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) are met. We note, however, that the expense to be incurred for a new hearing may outweigh the costs sought by the state. Ortiz v. State, 884 So.2d 77 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

WARNER, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Noble v. State, 962 So. 2d 360, 2007 WL 2043444 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

962 So. 2d 360 (Noble v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. TMG STAFFING SERVICES, INC.
962 So. 2d 360 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)