Noble v. State

578 So. 2d 63, 16 Fla. L. Weekly 1105, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3656
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 24, 1991
DocketNo. 91-0005
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 578 So. 2d 63 (Noble v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Noble v. State, 578 So. 2d 63, 16 Fla. L. Weekly 1105, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3656 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Noble appeals the summary denial of his 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm the denial of post-conviction relief as to all claims contained in the motion except the claim of ineffectiveness of trial counsel based upon trial counsel’s failure to file a motion for new trial. As to this claim, we remand to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing or for attachment of portions of the record show[64]*64ing the defendant is not entitled to relief. Gentry v. State, 464 So.2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terrett v. State
589 So. 2d 1047 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
578 So. 2d 63, 16 Fla. L. Weekly 1105, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noble-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.