Noble v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Noble v. State

715 S.W.2d 448, 290 Ark. 74, 1986 Ark. LEXIS 2203

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided September 29, 1986·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, John L. Noble, by his attorney, Maxie G. Kizer, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and it was no fault of the appellant. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a miscalculation on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, John L. Noble, by his attorney, Maxie G. Kizer, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and it was no fault of the appellant. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a miscalculation on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Noble v. State, 715 S.W.2d 448, 290 Ark. 74, 1986 Ark. LEXIS 2203 (Ark. 1986).

Pincite

715 S.W.2d 448 (Noble v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.