Noble v. Scofield

44 Vt. 281
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedJanuary 15, 1872
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 44 Vt. 281 (Noble v. Scofield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Noble v. Scofield, 44 Vt. 281 (Vt. 1872).

Opinion

[285]*285The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wheeler, J.

When Kendall became surety upon the note for Scofield, he assumed upon himself payment of it, if Scofield should not pay it, and took upon himself the risk of any insolvency or bankruptcy into which Scofield might fall, that should either disable him from paying the note himself, or from repaying Kendall if he should pay it.. One of the payees suggested the suretyship and security against its liabilities as an inducement to it, but Scofield procured Kendall to enter into it. No fraud in the payees is found. The insolvency and bankruptcy of Scofield are the very things that Kendall took the risk of, and their occurrence cannot relieve him from his assumption.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Southwestern Co. v. Wynnegar
71 So. 737 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 Vt. 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noble-v-scofield-vt-1872.