Noble v. McMaken

Ohio Supreme Court

Noble v. McMaken

344 N.E.2d 129, 45 Ohio St. 2d 236, 74 Ohio Op. 2d 379, 1976 Ohio LEXIS 566

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 10, 1976

DocketNo. 75-1041

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 344 N.E.2d 129 (Noble v. McMaken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Noble v. McMaken, 344 N.E.2d 129, 45 Ohio St. 2d 236, 74 Ohio Op. 2d 379, 1976 Ohio LEXIS 566 (Ohio 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In Freeman v. Maxwell (1965), 4 Ohio St. 2d 4, this court held' “that-the availability of the post-conviction remedies provided by Sections 2953.21 to>2953.24, inclusive, Revised Code, is ground for denial of” a writ of habeas corpus.

Accordingly, on authority of Freeman v. Maxwell, supra, and for the reasons stated therein, the judgment of the Court of Appeals, dismissing appellant’s complaint for a writ of habeas corpus, is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze:, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI