Noble v. McMaken

344 N.E.2d 129, 45 Ohio St. 2d 236, 74 Ohio Op. 2d 379, 1976 Ohio LEXIS 566
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 10, 1976·No. No. 75-1041·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In Freeman v. Maxwell (1965), 4 Ohio St. 2d 4, this court held' “that-the availability of the post-conviction remedies provided by Sections 2953.21 to>2953.24, inclusive, Revised Code, is ground for denial of” a writ of habeas corpus.

Accordingly, on authority of Freeman v. Maxwell, supra, and for the reasons stated therein, the judgment of the Court of Appeals, dismissing appellant’s complaint for a writ of habeas corpus, is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze:, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Noble v. McMaken, 344 N.E.2d 129, 45 Ohio St. 2d 236, 74 Ohio Op. 2d 379, 1976 Ohio LEXIS 566 (Ohio 1976).

344 N.E.2d 129 (Noble v. McMaken) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Smith
2012 Ohio 5420 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2012)
Gerhart v. Tate
515 N.E.2d 917 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1987)
Samuel Keener v. L. G. Ridenour, Warden
594 F.2d 581 (Sixth Circuit, 1979)